Lifestyle
drugs touted on TV send many rushing to doctors
April 02, 2006
If you flip on the television,
you’ll learn from myriad ads that you
can’t sleep, your cholesterol is out of
whack, your sex
life is suffering and your allergies are
keeping you from enjoying life.
Oh yeah, and that you’re
way too depressed to deal with any of it.
But don’t fear. There’s Lunesta
and Ambien for sleep; Crestor and Zocor for
cholesterol; Cialis and Viagra for erectile
dysfunction; Claritin and Zyrtec for allergies;
and Zoloft and Paxil for depression.
Sure, there are some side effects (nausea,
dizziness, drowsiness and four-hour erections),
so "ask your doctor if this drug is right
for you."
It’s called direct-to-consumer
advertising, and pharmaceutical companies are
counting on television viewers to take the bait,
remember the drug name and call their doctors.
"For the 65-year-old post-menstrual
woman asking what Cialis
is and does she need Cialis . . . that’s
a waste of time," said Dr. Elena Christofides,
an endocrinologist in Victorian Village.
"Many people just write the prescriptions
for the patients because it’s easier to
do that than arguing . . ."
Drugmakers say they do it to educate the public.
"It raises awareness and encourages them
to seek medical attention if they think they
have a particular disease," said Gaile
Renegar, a spokeswoman for drugmaker GlaxoSmithKline.
GlaxoSmithKline products include Advair, Flonase
and Paxil.
A 2005 poll by the Kaiser Family Foundation,
a nonprofit research group, found that 23 percent
of adults who saw a drug advertisement asked
their doctor about the medication. Of those,
75 percent received a prescription.
Pharmaceutical companies spent $11.9 billion
advertising to doctors and consumers in 2004,
according to the foundation. That year, they
spent $38.8 billion on research and development,
according to Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers
of America.
Americans spent $188.5 billion on prescriptions
in 2004. In 1998, they spent $88 billion.
The Food and Drug Administration didn’t
allow drugmakers to advertise on television
or radio until 1997.
While prescription-drug sales are a small part
of the nation’s overall health-care costs,
they are the fastest growing area with double-digit
rate increases since 1995, according to Kaiser.
"It does put more pressure on physicians
to communicate with their patients about this,"
said Mollyann Brodie, vice president for public
opinion and media research at Kaiser.
And if you think there are more cholesterol
ads during the evening news, you’re right.
Networks give advertisers information about
who watches specific programs to better direct
products, said Robert P. Leone, a marketing
professor at Ohio State University. He said
commercials during the evening news are aimed
at consumers with high education and income
levels.
Dr. Stephen Canowitz, a Columbus internal medicine
and pediatrics physician, said about a third
of his patients ask about specific drugs they
say they’ve seen advertised.
"If they can get five patients on that
medicine, with (the blood-thinner) Plavix being
$5 per pill, they’ve basically paid for
that ad," he said. "Patients will
be on it for 30 years under their marketing
scheme."
Some physicians say they are concerned that
reading all the side effects during commercials
— it’s an FDA requirement —
can scare some patients from taking a drug that
could help them.
"They don’t list the percentage
of the side effects, and the consumer thinks
everybody gets all the side effects . . . "
Christofides said.
Then there are the free trial prescriptions
advertised on television. Consumers can call
for vouchers that they take to their doctors.
"It would be hard to tell someone ‘no’
that way — they’re all kind of expensive,"
said Dr. Kristin Oaks, a family physician in
Worthington.
"Most of those things they’re advertising,
they’re more like lifestyle-type drugs.
You don’t hear a lot of blood-pressure
medications or diabetes. It’s Viagra or
your toenails can look prettier."
Source: http://www.dispatch.com/health/health.php?story=dispatch/2006/04/02/20060402-A1-02.html
|